Cannabis Referendum Conference lays foundation for Yes campaign

5
8

We’re here to campaign for a yes vote!

That was the overwhelming message from the Cannabis Referendum Conference, held recently in Wellington.

Organised by the Cannabis Referendum Coalition (CRC), a campaign group made up of aligned reformist organisations and individuals, the #MakeItLegalconference brought together over 120 people from all walks of life in the rather salubrious surrounds of the James Cook Hotel Grand Chancellor.

As we all know, the Green Party has extracted a promise from the Government, as part of their confidence and supply agreement, to hold a referendum on legalising cannabis at or before the 2020 election.

While we don’t yet know the exact question, the Government will only put up a winning proposition – and there is overwhelming support for legalising personal use, with strong but somewhat less support for regulated sales or home growing.

The stars are uniquely aligned for cannabis law reform – but time is fast running out to influence the question or format. We may have just a few months to get the basics in place, if there is to be legislation triggered by the referendum vote.

That’s why we need to be smart, proactive, and keep the pressure on.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

The conference was part of our plan to bring our A Game to the referendum campaign, and achieved it’s three main aims:

  • Credibility: enhancing the reputation of our fledgling campaign organisation
  • Publicity: for the event itself, our messages, and showcasing new spokespeople
  • Unity: having common purpose, and presenting a unified message together

The day got off to a great start with Duncan Garner promoting CRC steering group member Rebecca Reider’s “impressive justification for legalisation

We got right into it, with panel discussions to bring attendees quickly up to date with in-depth and informed discussions of the likely referendum process, what we can do to influence it, and how we can campaign most effectively for a Yes vote.

Early in the day I had the privilege of chairing a panel on lessons from the medicinal cannabis campaign. This featured four advocates who made a huge difference in their own ways: Green MP Chloe Swarbrick, MCANZ head Shane le Brun, Hikurangi Cannabis Company CEO Manu Caddie, and NORML board member Rebecca Reider.

Shane’s biggest lesson from the medicinal campaign was to properly resource officials to perform the work we’re expecting of them. See Radio NZ – “Medicinal cannabis regulation ‘could be all sorted in six months’

To help overcome stereotypes and prejudice in winning over middle New Zealand, Manu Caddie suggested smoke-ups outside Parliament aren’t going to cut it (see Stuff.co.nzCannabis reform advocates preach education over ‘smoke-ups’ outside Parliament”)

Eric Crampton, economist with The New Zealand Initiative, then interviewed Greg O’Connor, former Police Association head and now Labour Party MP for Ohario (replacing Peter Dunne). Greg was well known for opposing cannabis reforms but had something of a conversion after visiting Colorado. He now advocates “doing it properly” and legalising, not decriminalising, cannabis.

Dr Crampton further explained how alcohol laws and regulations provide a ready-made template for legal cannabis sales in a follow-up Newsroom article (see – “Regulate cannabis like booze”).

Former Prime Minister Helen Clark, who is now a member of the Global Commission on Drug Policy, addressed the conference via a pre-recorded video that can be viewed on YouTube. Her message was one of unity, and getting behind a yes vote, whatever that may be – because it has to be better than what we have now.

Delegates heard more than once “don’t let perfect get in the way of better”. This is a once-in-a-generation chance and no policy will be perfect for everyone. But any form of legalisation will be an improvement over prohibition.

By far the most in-depth and considered coverage of the conference was from the chair of the most in-depth panel: Russell Brown, who over ninety minutes interviewed Chloe Swarbrick and Labour MP Ginny Anderson about the referendum process. Russell’s report is well worth reading (see Public Address “Getting serious about the cannabis referendum”)

The team from Fresh Culture have cut a video featuring many of the conference speakers and some interesting attendees (see Fresh Culture S01E02 – Cannabis Referendum Conference on Facebook or Vimeo – use code “420” to watch).

At the business end of the day, delegates pondered several resolutions intended to capture the mood of the room and what, after hearing the evidence and the options available to us, we though the best way forward would be. It was resolved that this Conference:

  • Commends the Coalition Government for its intention to hold a referendum on the legal status of cannabis at or before the next election.
  • Expects that all political parties and all Members of Parliament commit to enacting the outcomes of the referendum in good faith.
  • Proposes that the referendum be worded to test public support for two separate questions: that adults be allowed to grow and possess cannabis for personal use, and be allowed to purchase cannabis and cannabis products from licensed premises.
  • Calls for a properly resourced public discussion to provide impartial and accurate information to help the public make an informed decision.

The Cannabis Referendum Coalition exists to support grassroots education and mobilisation, and support the Yes vote in ways that government bodies and other NGO’s cannot. Anyone is welcome to join who wants to work constructively for a Yes vote (for more on the CRC, see One News “Organisations who want cannabis legalised band together at conference”).

If you want to find out more or to get involved like me, the Cannabis Referendum Coalition is at www.makeitlegal.nz

 

5 COMMENTS

  1. I am sure cannabis and cannabis products will be legalised and soon. However, I am also sure it will be kept in the hands of Big Pharma and will be something else unaffordable for the people who need it.

  2. The problem is that after a yes vote to both questions (the right approach) proposed here, all government might do afterwards is decriminalise or legalise possession of amounts for personal use.

    In any other area, this would be sen as pandering to established economic interests – those currently illegally growing and supplying the product.

    The issue is mandate for people to either grow their own or access supply from a licensed retailer/seller.

    The legislative aftermath, is in how much can be grown for personal use, and who is licensed to grow for supply to others, and then retail arrangements (ID, drug education, rationing levels of supply for younger users).

  3. Isn’t it funny? That we westerners flail about in our determined efforts to be safe,ernest and erstwhile. We’d strap an orange flashing light to a penis at a brothel. We’re going to need WOF’s for our sneakers soon. ” Nah mate. Sole’s too thin. You’ll slip. Might take out a tooth. Or look silly as you skid. Can’t have that. ”
    Glass of water? Risk of drowning.
    Socks inside but no slippers?
    “You’ll slip there too! Take out the blinds, neighbours’ll see your arse. Cost of post-humiliation counselling? Who’s paying for that? Tax payer? I’m a tax payer and I’m not fuckin’ paying for that. “
    Pot? Harmless fun. Cops? Some cops will fuck you up for it.
    Grow a few? Make a couple o’ hundie to pay for the power and and a few ciggies and the whole world goes fuckin’ wobbly while the banksters take billions from us after our cuzzies ripped us off and sold our stuff and things to them fuckers in other countries?
    I was standing, with a few fellows, outside a Club one morning. We were mutually in love with the Universe and all things within it and as we shared a cannabis cigarette around the posse I heard a gentleman hiss “ Hey! Hey! It’s the cops! “ I entered a close orbit on the situation, without burning off my nose cone upon re entry, and manoeuvred my billions of cells and nerve endings and veins and bones and muscles around to see where the soft hissings were coming from … And behold! A police gentle person was smiling. Someone ate that joint. Embers and all.
    That’s how it should be. Comrades, tho from opposing trenches. There’s a lot to be said for a status quo.

  4. Isn’t it funny? That we westerners flail about in our determined efforts to be safe,ernest and erstwhile. We’d strap an orange flashing light to a penis at a brothel. We’re going to need WOF’s for our sneakers soon. ” Nah mate. Sole’s too thin. You’ll slip. Might take out a tooth. Or look silly as you skid. Can’t have that. ”
    Glass of water? Risk of drowning.
    Socks inside but no slippers?
    “You’ll slip there too! Take out the blinds, neighbours’ll see your arse. Cost of post-humiliation counselling? Who’s paying for that? Tax payer? I’m a tax payer and I’m not fuckin’ paying for that. “
    Pot? Harmless fun. Cops? Some cops will fuck you up for it.
    Grow a few? Make a couple o’ hundie to pay for the power and and a few ciggies and the whole world goes fuckin’ wobbly while the banksters take billions from us after our cuzzies ripped us off and sold our stuff and things to them fuckers in other countries?
    I was standing, with a few fellows, outside a Club one morning. We were mutually in love with the Universe and all things within it and as we shared a cannabis cigarette around the posse I heard a gentleman hiss “ Hey! Hey! It’s the cops! “ I entered a close orbit on the situation, without burning off my nose cone upon re entry, and manoeuvred my billions of cells and nerve endings and veins and bones and muscles around to see where the soft hissings were coming from … And behold! Two police gentle persons were smiling . Someone ate that joint. Embers and all. Might have been one of the cops??
    That’s how it should be. Comrades, tho from opposing trenches. There’s a lot to be said for a status quo in times of need. Just sayin’.

  5. My apologies for being unable to attend the conference, due to being in China 😉 Glad to hear it went well. If there’s anything I can do remotely to support the Yes campaign, anything that can be done over the net for example, please do let me know.

    Totally agree about the two part question. It allows us a chance at going full Canada in one step, without giving up the chance for personal use decriminalization if the majority aren’t quite ready for legal dispensaries yet. Would be great to present some potential wordings, with minimal wiggle room, and even model legislation that could be passed in the case of a yes/no, or a yes/yes (perhaps based on the Drug Foundation’s work in that area). Let’s make the most of the bone we’ve been thrown here!

Comments are closed.