-
Eric Crampton writes –
Richard Harman’s Politik newsletter provides a bit of the context that ought to have been showing up in other media reports on potential reductions in public service staffing.
Media has been reporting on staffing cuts on the order of about 7%. Is that a big number or a small number relative to growth in the overall public service?
The public service in 2023 had headcount 38% larger than it had in 2017, when National was last in office, and 19% larger than in 2019, before Covid.
There has not been 20% population growth since 2019.
Budget 2024 needs to provide a credible path out of deficits, ideally focused on getting Core Crown expenditure, as a fraction of GDP, back to where it was in 2019 – at least as an interim goal. That would only take things back to where Ardern had had it in the 2019 Wellbeing Budget.
The 2019 Wellbeing Budget was not austere. It was set to increase Core Crown expenditure’s fraction of GDP by about a percentage point as medium-term steady state, from just under 28% of GDP to just under 29% of GDP.
The 2023 Half-Year Fiscal Update had forecast 2024 Core Crown expenditure at 33.4% of GDP, and a forecast path down to 31.4% by 2028.
Shaving that back down to 29% more quickly isn’t austerity, or at least not the swear word version of it. It’s just retrenching after a giant shock.
And it sure would be great if news outlets appalled at 7% cuts to Ministry rosters could remind folks that that would still generally be a substantial increase on pre-Covid staffing.
———————-
This article by Eric Crampton was first published on Offsetting Behaviour.
Point of Order 
You didn’t get the neo-Marxist memo?
“Outside of the Beehive, there’s an almost total consensus that it would be crazy to push through tax cuts at the moment.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Too many opportunist appointments to positions on ethnicity, sexual orientation and inclusiveness. Most of these being unqualified for specific vacancies, but given over-salaried jobs becuase of criteria directives of the Labour/Green/TPM circus. These must all go, being neither use nor ornament, but a drain on taxpayers already overburdened.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Too many opportunist appointments to positions on ethnicity, sexual orientation and inclusiveness. Most of these being unqualified for specific vacancies, but given over-salaried jobs becuase of criteria directives of the Labour/Green/TPM circus. These must all go, being neither use nor ornament, but a drain on taxpayers already overburdened.
LikeLike